|
Chemtrails
Web Polymers
Patents
Pic Gallery
Aircraft
Charts
Health Issues
Atmospheric Physics
HAARP
Geoegineering
Global Warming
Climate Change
Ozone Depletion
Greenhouse Gases
Phytoplankton
Oceans
Bush
File
Cheney File
Iraq
War
"You take the
blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and you believe
whatever you want to believe."

Escape
Enter
"You take the red pill and
you stay in Wonderland and I'll show you how deep the
rabbit-hole goes."
Store and Support
|
By Geoffrey Lean
The Independent
July 20, 2003
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/environment/story.jsp?story=425893
President George Bush is targeting the international treaty to save
the
ozone layer which protects all life on earth from deadly radiation,
The
Independent on Sunday can reveal.
New US demands - tabled at a little-noticed meeting in Montreal
earlier this
month - threaten to unravel one of the greatest environmental success
stories of the past few decades, causing millions of deaths from
cancer.
The news comes at a particularly embarrassing time for the Prime
Minister,
Tony Blair, who pressed the President in their talks in Washington
last week
to stop his attempts to sabotage the Kyoto Protocol which sets out to
control global warming: one of the few international issues on which
they
differ.
Now, instead of heeding Mr Blair, Mr Bush is undermining the ozone
treaty as
well, by seeking to perpetuate the use of the most ozone-destructive
chemical still employed in developed countries, otherwise soon to be
phased
out. Ironically, it was sustained pressure from the Reagan
administration,
in which Mr Bush's father served as vice-president, that ensured the
treaty
was adopted in the first place. It has proved such a success that
environmentalists have long regarded it as inviolable.
The ozone layer - made of a type of oxygen so thinly scattered through
the
upper atmosphere that, if gathered all together, it would form a ring
around
the earth no thicker than the sole of a shoe - screens out the sun's
harmful
ultraviolet rays which would, otherwise, wipe out terrestrial life. As
it
weakens, more of the rays get through, causing skin cancer and
blindness
from cataracts.
The world was shocked to discover in the 1980s that pollution from
man-made
chemicals had opened a hole the size of the United States in the layer
above
Antarctica, and had thinned it worldwide. Led by the US, nations moved
with
unprecedented speed to agree the treaty, called the Montreal Protocol,
in
1987 - which started the process of phasing out use of the chemicals.
The measures have been progressively tightened ever since. Scientists
reckon
that they will eventually prevent 2 million cases of cancer a year in
the US
and Europe alone. But President Bush's new demands threaten to throw
the
process into reverse.
They centre on a pesticide, methyl bromide, now the greatest attacker
of
ozone left in industrialised countries. The US is responsible for a
quarter
of the world's consumption of the chemical, which has also been linked
with
increased prostate cancers in farmers.
Under an extension to the Montreal Protocol, agreed in 1997, the
pesticide
is being gradually phased out and replaced with substitutes; its use
in the
West is due to end completely in 2005. Nations are legally allowed to
extend
the use of small amounts in "critical" applications, but the US is
demanding
exemptions far beyond those permitted, for uses ranging from growing
strawberries to tending golf courses.
It is also pressing to exploit a loophole in the treaty - allowing the
use
of the chemical to treat wood packaging - so that, instead of being
phased
out, its use would increase threefold.
The demands now go to an international conference in Nairobi this
autumn.
Experts fear that, if agreed, the treaty will begin to fall apart, not
least
because developing countries - which are following rich nations in
phasing
out ozone-depleting chemicals - could cease their efforts.
"The US is reneging on the agreement, and working very, very hard to
get
other countries to agree," said David Doniger, a former senior US
government
official dealing with ozone issues, who now works for the Natural
Resources
Defense Council. "If it succeeds, it threatens to unravel the whole
fabric
of the treaty."
Dr Joe Farman, the Cambridge scientist who discovered the Antarctic
ozone
hole, added: "This is madness. We do not need this chemical. We do
need the
ozone layer. How stupid can people be?"
- FAIR
USE NOTICE. This document contains copyrighted material whose use
has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
Chemtrailpatrol is making this article available in our efforts to
advance the understanding of environmental, justice issues, corporate
accountability, human rights, labor rights and social understanding.
We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If
you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Links
|